폴리부타디엔 고무 (Polybutadiene Rubber)

사건 정보

설명

The submissions made by the applicant in respect ofproduct under consideration are as follows: - a. There are 5 types of Polybutadiene Rubber out of which Titanium and Lithium grades are not made by the domestic industry. Titanium grade of Polybutadiene Rubber has inferior quality and has become obsolete. Lithium Grade is used in plastic modification. The scope of product under consideration therefore does not cover these two grades. b. A type/grade ofthe product can be excluded from the scope of investigation only when it is being imported and the domestic industry does not have the capacity of producing the particular grade. The domestic industry has the capacity to produce Neodymium grade and the same fact was verified by the Authority in the antidumping investigation and accordingly Neodymium Grade (Ndbr) had been included in the scope of product under consideration. The submissions made by other interested parties in respect of product under consideration are as follows: - a. Domestic industry does not produce Neodymium Grade (Ndbr) which has major imports from Korea RP. Even if produced, the product won't meet or pass industrial users quality certification. This product is limited in use for end-user, especially global tyre manufacturers. b. Ndbr grade is neither substitutable nor like article to other Polybutadiene Rubber grades as it has applications in high performance tyres. c. Domestic industry only once manufactured batch of Ndbr grade which was rejected by the user industry. Domestic industry never approached the user industry for sale of this grade. d. Imposition of provisional duties on Lithium and Titanium grade PBR should be revoked. e. Non-mentioning of correct grades in the recommendation para has led to an unintended imposition of lloh custom duty on Polybutadiene Rubber of all grades. Authority is requested for amendment for exclusion of titanium and grades of PBR.

출처: 한국무역협회 수입규제 통합조회 · 원문 보기 ↗

경과 6건

1. 2021-01-28
   원심 · 부과명령

   CBIC 세이프가드 부과명령 - ~ 2021. 7. 12 : 10% 2021 7. 12 ~ 2021. 7. 13 : 7.50%

2. 2020-10-22
   원심 · 최종판정

   DGTR 양자 세이프가드 최종판정 - 1년차 : MFN 100% - 2년차 : MFN 75%

3. 2020-07-13
   원심 · 부과명령

   CBIC 폴리부타디엔 고무 잠정조치 부과명령 * 4002.20 대상 10% 부과 # 잠정조치

4. 2020-05-12
   원심 · 예비판정

   DGTR 반덤핑 예비판정 (잠정조치 부과) - 현행 MFN관세율과 CEPA 체결 전 관세율 중 낮은 관세율 (부과일로부터 200일 간)

5. 2019-11-07
   조사개시

   DGTR 양자 세이프가드 조사개시 : 2019. 11. 7 ㅇ POI : 2015. 4월~2019. 6월 * 한-인도 CEPA에 따른 양자 세이프가드 조치

6. 날짜 미상
   제소

   M/s Reliance Industries Limited 피제소국 : 한국,